Genes
NCBI Gene
One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.
85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last3,441 to 3,460 of 85,013
| Comparison | With the outcome | Risk difference, 95% interval | Participants | Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: deaths from any cause | 49 of 1,910 3 of 111 | -0.1 points -5.1 to 1.8 | 2,021 | NCT01146652 Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND) |
| Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: serious adverse events | 617 of 1,910 27 of 111 | 8.0 points -1.0 to 15.3 | 2,021 | NCT01146652 Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND) |
| FF 100 µg vs FF/VI 100/25 µg: Number of Participants With 1 or More Severe Asthma Exacerbations | 186 of 1,010 154 of 1,009 | 3.2 points -0.1 to 6.4 | 2,019 | NCT01086384 Asthma Exacerbation Study |
| FF 100 µg vs FF/VI 100/25 µg: serious adverse events | 29 of 1,010 41 of 1,009 | -1.2 points -2.8 to 0.4 | 2,019 | NCT01086384 Asthma Exacerbation Study |
| Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) vs Standard Medical Care (SMC): Evaluate the Safety of the Maximum Administered Dose, 15 mg/kg (up to a Maximum 1,000 mg) of FCM Compared to SMC. | 6 of 996 22 of 1,022 | -1.6 points -2.7 to -0.5 | 2,018 | NCT00548860 Safety of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Post Partum Patients |
| Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) vs Standard Medical Care (SMC): serious adverse events | 6 of 996 22 of 1,022 | -1.6 points -2.7 to -0.5 | 2,018 | NCT00548860 Safety of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Post Partum Patients |
| Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Infection. | 281 of 1,009 329 of 1,009 | -4.8 points -8.7 to -0.7 | 2,018 | NCT01075178 Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease |
| Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Death | 9 of 1,009 10 of 1,009 | -0.1 points -1.0 to 0.8 | 2,018 | NCT01075178 Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease |
| Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Arrhythmia | 41 of 1,009 39 of 1,009 | 0.2 points -1.5 to 1.9 | 2,018 | NCT01075178 Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease |
| Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Infection, Serious Arrhythmia and/or Death | 303 of 1,009 349 of 1,009 | -4.6 points -8.6 to -0.5 | 2,018 | NCT01075178 Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease |
| Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): serious adverse events | 303 of 1,009 349 of 1,009 | -4.6 points -8.6 to -0.5 | 2,018 | NCT01075178 Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease |
| Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: serious adverse events | 76 of 1,007 66 of 1,009 | 1.0 points -1.2 to 3.3 | 2,016 | NCT00071032 Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
| Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: Myocardial Infarction | 23 of 1,005 38 of 1,008 | -1.5 points -3.0 to 0.0 | 2,013 | NCT00071032 Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
| Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, or Death for Any Reason | 43 of 1,005 52 of 1,008 | -0.9 points -2.8 to 1.0 | 2,013 | NCT00071032 Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease |
| Dabigatran 220mg vs Enoxaparin: serious adverse events | 57 of 1,010 59 of 1,003 | -0.2 points -2.3 to 1.8 | 2,013 | NCT00657150 Dabigatran Etexilate Compared With Enoxaparin in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Total Hip Arthroplasty |
| Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Maternal Postpartum Antibiotic Use | 166 of 992 126 of 1,018 | 4.4 points 1.3 to 7.4 | 2,010 | NCT01235546 Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection |
| Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Neonatal Serious Adverse Events | 5 of 992 7 of 1,018 | -0.2 points -1.0 to 0.6 | 2,010 | NCT01235546 Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection |
| Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Maternal Serious Adverse Events | 29 of 992 15 of 1,018 | 1.4 points 0.2 to 2.8 | 2,010 | NCT01235546 Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection |
| Placebo With Standard Prophylaxis vs Azithromycin (Zithromax) With Standard Prophylaxis: Neonatal Readmission | 43 of 992 39 of 1,018 | 0.5 points -1.2 to 2.3 | 2,010 | NCT01235546 Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection |
| Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Neonatal Morbidities (Listed Below) | 135 of 992 146 of 1,018 | -0.7 points -3.8 to 2.3 | 2,010 | NCT01235546 Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection |
Code
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=173"
Response
The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=173
{
"data": {
"total": 85013,
"results": [
{
"id": "NCT01146652-deaths",
"title": "Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: deaths from any cause",
"summary": "49 of 1910 against 3 of 111; risk difference -0.1 points, 95% interval -5.1 to 1.8; NCT01146652, Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)",
"record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01146652-deaths",
"nct_id": "NCT01146652",
"kind": "deaths",
"participants": 2021,
"risk_difference": {
"value": -0.0013725767652469252,
"lower": -0.05119458953826203,
"upper": 0.01817734717742504
},
"group_1": "49 of 1,910",
"group_2": "3 of 111",
"difference": "-0.1 points",
"interval": "-5.1 to 1.8",
"trial_title": "Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)"
},
{
"id": "NCT01146652-sae",
"title": "Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: serious adverse events",
"summary": "617 of 1910 against 27 of 111; risk difference 8.0 points, 95% interval -1.0 to 15.3; NCT01146652, Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)",
"record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01146652-sae",
"nct_id": "NCT01146652",
"kind": "serious-adverse-events",
"participants": 2021,
"risk_difference": {
"value": 0.07979340597141643,
"lower": -0.010123835602008358,
"upper": 0.15329885689566633
},
"group_1": "617 of 1,910",
"group_2": "27 of 111",
"difference": "8.0 points",
"interval": "-1.0 to 15.3",
"trial_title": "Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)"
}
],
"no_events": 33758,
"columns": [
{
"key": "title",
"label": "Comparison"
},
{
"key": "group_1",
"label": "With the outcome",
"under": "group_2"
},
{
"key": "difference",
"label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
"under": "interval"
},
{
"key": "participants",
"label": "Participants"
},
{
"key": "nct_id",
"label": "Trial",
"under": "trial_title"
}
],
"order": "Most participants first",
"kinds": {
"all": 85013,
"outcome": 33568,
"serious-adverse-events": 31897,
"deaths": 19548
}
},
"release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
"terms": [
{
"source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
"license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
"notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
"short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
},
{
"source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
"license": "none stated",
"notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
"short": "No license stated"
}
],
"next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=174",
"request_id": "KoadtV-sEf7p6QFu"
}Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
NCBI Gene
One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.
Patent publications
Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.
Opens sequences.conductscience.org
For software
Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome
Ask an assistant