ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last3,441 to 3,460 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: deaths from any cause49 of 1,910

3 of 111

-0.1 points

-5.1 to 1.8

2,021NCT01146652

Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)

Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: serious adverse events617 of 1,910

27 of 111

8.0 points

-1.0 to 15.3

2,021NCT01146652

Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)

FF 100 µg vs FF/VI 100/25 µg: Number of Participants With 1 or More Severe Asthma Exacerbations186 of 1,010

154 of 1,009

3.2 points

-0.1 to 6.4

2,019NCT01086384

Asthma Exacerbation Study

FF 100 µg vs FF/VI 100/25 µg: serious adverse events29 of 1,010

41 of 1,009

-1.2 points

-2.8 to 0.4

2,019NCT01086384

Asthma Exacerbation Study

Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) vs Standard Medical Care (SMC): Evaluate the Safety of the Maximum Administered Dose, 15 mg/kg (up to a Maximum 1,000 mg) of FCM Compared to SMC.6 of 996

22 of 1,022

-1.6 points

-2.7 to -0.5

2,018NCT00548860

Safety of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Post Partum Patients

Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) vs Standard Medical Care (SMC): serious adverse events6 of 996

22 of 1,022

-1.6 points

-2.7 to -0.5

2,018NCT00548860

Safety of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Post Partum Patients

Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Infection.281 of 1,009

329 of 1,009

-4.8 points

-8.7 to -0.7

2,018NCT01075178

Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease

Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Death9 of 1,009

10 of 1,009

-0.1 points

-1.0 to 0.8

2,018NCT01075178

Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease

Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Arrhythmia41 of 1,009

39 of 1,009

0.2 points

-1.5 to 1.9

2,018NCT01075178

Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease

Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): Comparison Between CASES and CONTROLS of the Occurrence of Specific Clinical Outcomes of Serious Infection, Serious Arrhythmia and/or Death303 of 1,009

349 of 1,009

-4.6 points

-8.6 to -0.5

2,018NCT01075178

Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease

Palivizumab-treated Subjects (CASES) vs Non-palivizumab-treated Subjects (CONTROLS): serious adverse events303 of 1,009

349 of 1,009

-4.6 points

-8.6 to -0.5

2,018NCT01075178

Retrospective Palivizumab Study in Children With Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease

Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: serious adverse events76 of 1,007

66 of 1,009

1.0 points

-1.2 to 3.3

2,016NCT00071032

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: Myocardial Infarction23 of 1,005

38 of 1,008

-1.5 points

-3.0 to 0.0

2,013NCT00071032

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, or Death for Any Reason43 of 1,005

52 of 1,008

-0.9 points

-2.8 to 1.0

2,013NCT00071032

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Dabigatran 220mg vs Enoxaparin: serious adverse events57 of 1,010

59 of 1,003

-0.2 points

-2.3 to 1.8

2,013NCT00657150

Dabigatran Etexilate Compared With Enoxaparin in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Maternal Postpartum Antibiotic Use166 of 992

126 of 1,018

4.4 points

1.3 to 7.4

2,010NCT01235546

Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection

Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Neonatal Serious Adverse Events5 of 992

7 of 1,018

-0.2 points

-1.0 to 0.6

2,010NCT01235546

Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection

Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Maternal Serious Adverse Events29 of 992

15 of 1,018

1.4 points

0.2 to 2.8

2,010NCT01235546

Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection

Placebo With Standard Prophylaxis vs Azithromycin (Zithromax) With Standard Prophylaxis: Neonatal Readmission43 of 992

39 of 1,018

0.5 points

-1.2 to 2.3

2,010NCT01235546

Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection

Placebo and Standard of Care vs Azithromycin and Standard of Care: Neonatal Morbidities (Listed Below)135 of 992

146 of 1,018

-0.7 points

-3.8 to 2.3

2,010NCT01235546

Study of Effectiveness and Safety of Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis to Prevent Post Cesarean Infection

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=173"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=173

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT01146652-deaths",
        "title": "Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: deaths from any cause",
        "summary": "49 of 1910 against 3 of 111; risk difference -0.1 points, 95% interval -5.1 to 1.8; NCT01146652, Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01146652-deaths",
        "nct_id": "NCT01146652",
        "kind": "deaths",
        "participants": 2021,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.0013725767652469252,
          "lower": -0.05119458953826203,
          "upper": 0.01817734717742504
        },
        "group_1": "49 of 1,910",
        "group_2": "3 of 111",
        "difference": "-0.1 points",
        "interval": "-5.1 to 1.8",
        "trial_title": "Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT01146652-sae",
        "title": "Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "617 of 1910 against 27 of 111; risk difference 8.0 points, 95% interval -1.0 to 15.3; NCT01146652, Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01146652-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT01146652",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 2021,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.07979340597141643,
          "lower": -0.010123835602008358,
          "upper": 0.15329885689566633
        },
        "group_1": "617 of 1,910",
        "group_2": "27 of 111",
        "difference": "8.0 points",
        "interval": "-1.0 to 15.3",
        "trial_title": "Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=174",
  "request_id": "KoadtV-sEf7p6QFu"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?