ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last3,701 to 3,720 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Rehospitalisation for Cardiac Reasons45 of 949

41 of 948

0.4 points

-1.5 to 2.3

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Rehospitalisation for Non-cardiac Reasons19 of 949

11 of 948

0.8 points

-0.3 to 2.1

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Serious Resuscitated Ventricular Fibrillation in Association With Invasive Procedures10 of 949

29 of 948

-2.0 points

-3.4 to -0.7

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Total Fatal Stroke7 of 949

4 of 948

0.3 points

-0.4 to 1.1

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): deaths from any cause43 of 949

42 of 948

0.1 points

-1.8 to 2.0

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With All-cause Mortality, Cardiogenic Shock, Congestive Heart Failure and Recurrent Myocardial Infarction Within 30 Days for FAS.116 of 949

135 of 948

-2.0 points

-5.1 to 1.0

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Cardiac Mortality31 of 949

32 of 948

-0.1 points

-1.8 to 1.5

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Minor Non-intracranial Bleeds206 of 949

191 of 948

1.6 points

-2.1 to 5.2

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With All Cause Death and Shock and CHF100 of 949

123 of 948

-2.4 points

-5.3 to 0.5

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Total Non-disabling Stroke8 of 949

1 of 948

0.7 points

0.1 to 1.6

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): serious adverse events146 of 949

164 of 948

-1.9 points

-5.2 to 1.4

1,897NCT00623623

STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction

M-M-R II ® vs Placebo: Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection up to 150 Days After Trial Intervention100 of 945

98 of 951

0.3 points

-2.5 to 3.0

1,896NCT04333732

CROWN CORONATION: COVID-19 Research Outcomes Worldwide Network for CORONAvirus prevenTION

Dapivirine Vaginal Ring vs Placebo Vaginal Ring: The Incidence of Curable STIs682 of 1,271

315 of 624

3.2 points

-1.6 to 7.9

1,895NCT01539226

Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Dapivirine Vaginal Matrix Ring in Healthy HIV-Negative Women

Placebo + IIV vs MEDI7510 + IIV: Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms558 of 948

606 of 946

-5.2 points

-9.6 to -0.8

1,894NCT02508194

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MEDI7510 in Older Adults

Placebo + IIV vs MEDI7510 + IIV: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events141 of 948

146 of 946

-0.6 points

-3.8 to 2.7

1,894NCT02508194

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MEDI7510 in Older Adults

Placebo + IIV vs MEDI7510+IIV: deaths from any cause5 of 948

3 of 946

0.2 points

-0.5 to 0.9

1,894NCT02508194

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MEDI7510 in Older Adults

Placebo + IIV vs MEDI7510+IIV: serious adverse events57 of 948

64 of 946

-0.8 points

-3.0 to 1.5

1,894NCT02508194

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MEDI7510 in Older Adults

Fluzone HD + mRNA-1345 Followed by Placebo vs Fluzone HD + Placebo Followed by mRNA-1345: Number of Participants With Unsolicited AEs Up to 21 Days After Day 22 Injection60 of 947

71 of 946

-1.2 points

-3.5 to 1.1

1,893NCT06060457

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immune Response of mRNA-1345, a Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), When Co-administered With a Fluzone HD, in Adults ≥65 Years of Age

Fluzone HD + mRNA-1345 Followed by Placebo vs Fluzone HD + Placebo Followed by mRNA-1345: Number of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) Up to 21 Days After Day 1 Injection72 of 947

72 of 946

-0.0 points

-2.4 to 2.4

1,893NCT06060457

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immune Response of mRNA-1345, a Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), When Co-administered With a Fluzone HD, in Adults ≥65 Years of Age

Fluzone HD + mRNA-1345 Followed by Placebo vs Fluzone HD + Placebo Followed by mRNA-1345: serious adverse events23 of 947

33 of 946

-1.1 points

-2.6 to 0.5

1,893NCT06060457

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immune Response of mRNA-1345, a Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), When Co-administered With a Fluzone HD, in Adults ≥65 Years of Age

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=186"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=186

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT00623623-b9ce0959",
        "title": "Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Rehospitalisation for Cardiac Reasons",
        "summary": "45 of 949 against 41 of 948; risk difference 0.4 points, 95% interval -1.5 to 2.3; NCT00623623, STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00623623-b9ce0959",
        "nct_id": "NCT00623623",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 1897,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.004169389941888639,
          "lower": -0.014830286578155369,
          "upper": 0.02325145009135344
        },
        "group_1": "45 of 949",
        "group_2": "41 of 948",
        "difference": "0.4 points",
        "interval": "-1.5 to 2.3",
        "trial_title": "STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00623623-c787ae85",
        "title": "Tenecteplase (Group A) vs Primary PCI (Group B): Number of Patients With Rehospitalisation for Non-cardiac Reasons",
        "summary": "19 of 949 against 11 of 948; risk difference 0.8 points, 95% interval -0.3 to 2.1; NCT00623623, STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00623623-c787ae85",
        "nct_id": "NCT00623623",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 1897,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.008417699288169201,
          "lower": -0.0031297120397074333,
          "upper": 0.020581111517223874
        },
        "group_1": "19 of 949",
        "group_2": "11 of 948",
        "difference": "0.8 points",
        "interval": "-0.3 to 2.1",
        "trial_title": "STREAM-Strategic Reperfusion (With Tenecteplase and Antithrombotic Treatment) Early After Myocardial Infarction"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=187",
  "request_id": "FMhRqWY6vF8zWHRE"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?