ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 2026-11-10.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last701 to 720 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Coronary Revascularization Procedures (Excluding Coronary Revascularization Planned Prior to Randomization, But Performed After Randomization) During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Event926 of 6,504

967 of 6,522

-0.6 points

-1.8 to 0.6

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events268 of 6,522

243 of 6,504

0.4 points

-0.3 to 1.0

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality During the Time Period for Vital Status376 of 6,504

403 of 6,522

-0.4 points

-1.2 to 0.4

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Event in the Composite of CHD Death and Non-fatal MI During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events701 of 6,504

725 of 6,522

-0.3 points

-1.4 to 0.7

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Stroke (Fatal/Non-fatal) During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events145 of 6,504

130 of 6,522

0.2 points

-0.3 to 0.7

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Event in the Composite of Major Coronary Events During the Time Period for Follow-up (FU) of Cardiovascular (CV) Event903 of 6,504

910 of 6,522

-0.1 points

-1.3 to 1.1

13,026NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Baseline (Duke) vs Post Comfort Talk® Training: IV Sedation Rate (Duke)103 of 4,051

196 of 8,879

0.3 points

-0.2 to 0.9

12,930NCT02427737

Comfort Talk and Economic Outcomes in MRI

Baseline (Duke) vs Post Comfort Talk® Training: Oral Sedation Rate (Duke)100 of 4,051

128 of 8,879

1.0 points

0.5 to 1.6

12,930NCT02427737

Comfort Talk and Economic Outcomes in MRI

Baseline (Duke) vs Post Comfort Talk® Training: Incompletions (Duke)52 of 4,051

27 of 8,879

1.0 points

0.6 to 1.4

12,930NCT02427737

Comfort Talk and Economic Outcomes in MRI

Baseline (Duke) vs Post Comfort Talk® Training: Disruptive Motion (Duke)42 of 4,051

11 of 8,879

0.9 points

0.6 to 1.3

12,930NCT02427737

Comfort Talk and Economic Outcomes in MRI

Baseline (Duke) vs Post Comfort Talk® Training: General Anesthesia Rate (Duke)29 of 4,051

55 of 8,879

0.1 points

-0.2 to 0.4

12,930NCT02427737

Comfort Talk and Economic Outcomes in MRI

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any cause376 of 6,452

403 of 6,465

-0.4 points

-1.2 to 0.4

12,917NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse events2,933 of 6,452

3,011 of 6,465

-1.1 points

-2.8 to 0.6

12,917NCT01000727

The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial

Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process) vs Universal Screening Arm (Intervention): MDD Identification: Adolescents Confirmed With MDD Symptoms in Need of Follow-up Based on Triage by the School SAP Team64 of 6,436

233 of 6,473

-2.6 points

-3.1 to -2.1

12,909NCT03716869

Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process) vs Universal Screening Arm (Intervention): MDD Screen Positive/Concern: Adolescents Who Screen Positive for MDD Either by PHQ-9 (Universal Screening Arm Only) or by Concern for MDD Prompting a Request for SAP Triage200 of 6,436

1,026 of 6,473

-12.7 points

-13.7 to -11.8

12,909NCT03716869

Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process) vs Universal Screening Arm (Intervention): Suicidal Adolescent96 of 6,436

622 of 6,473

-8.1 points

-8.9 to -7.4

12,909NCT03716869

Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process) vs Universal Screening Arm (Intervention): Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Composite: Positive Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Universal Arm) or MDD Concern Prompting Student Assistance Program (SAP) Referral, Confirmed MDD Symptoms by SAP, Engage With One SAP Recommended Service/Treatment35 of 6,436

80 of 6,473

-0.7 points

-1.0 to -0.4

12,909NCT03716869

Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process) vs Universal Screening Arm (Intervention): MDD Treatment Engagement: Successful Engagement With at Least One SAP Recommendation35 of 6,436

80 of 6,473

-0.7 points

-1.0 to -0.4

12,909NCT03716869

Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Vorapaxar vs Placebo: serious adverse events1,866 of 6,446

1,718 of 6,441

2.3 points

0.7 to 3.8

12,887NCT00527943

Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar (SCH 530348; MK-5348) in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Particpants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRA•CER) (Study P04736)

VAX-MOM Intervention vs Standard of Care: Rate of Tdap Vaccination4,532 of 5,992

5,452 of 6,768

-4.9 points

-6.4 to -3.5

12,760NCT04444518

Increasing Influenza and Tdap Vaccination of Pregnant Women

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=36

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT01000727-60160a8d",
        "title": "Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Coronary Revascularization Procedures (Excluding Coronary Revascularization Planned Prior to Randomization, But Performed After Randomization) During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Event",
        "summary": "926 of 6504 against 967 of 6522; risk difference -0.6 points, 95% interval -1.8 to 0.6; NCT01000727, The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01000727-60160a8d",
        "nct_id": "NCT01000727",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 13026,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.005893478897990467,
          "lower": -0.01800024755142994,
          "upper": 0.006214456656616189
        },
        "group_1": "926 of 6,504",
        "group_2": "967 of 6,522",
        "difference": "-0.6 points",
        "interval": "-1.8 to 0.6",
        "trial_title": "The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT01000727-6f4c0537",
        "title": "Darapladib 160 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death During the Time Period for Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events",
        "summary": "268 of 6522 against 243 of 6504; risk difference 0.4 points, 95% interval -0.3 to 1.0; NCT01000727, The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01000727-6f4c0537",
        "nct_id": "NCT01000727",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 13026,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.0037300660495105387,
          "lower": -0.002950852111549564,
          "upper": 0.010423717236930391
        },
        "group_1": "268 of 6,522",
        "group_2": "243 of 6,504",
        "difference": "0.4 points",
        "interval": "-0.3 to 1.0",
        "trial_title": "The Stabilization Of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "None stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=37",
  "request_id": "uKfKIFdL6b04w73y"
}
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0Next page

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Open193,990 genes2026-11-11

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Open611,552 trials2026-11-12

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

For invited accounts.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

By invitation39,249,078 sequences2026-11-05

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?