ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005012

Comparisons in its trials29

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Combination of Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + Nivolumab vs Nivolumab: deaths from any cause9 of 3784 of 387765NCT04410445Trial comparisons
Combination of Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + Nivolumab vs Nivolumab: serious adverse events74 of 37833 of 387765NCT04410445Trial comparisons
Dabrafenib + Trametinib vs Dabrafenib + Placebo: Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator146 of 210113 of 210420NCT01584648Trial comparisons
Cohort 1: 8 HLA-A2-restricted Peptides and CpG 7909 vs Cohort 2: 8 HLA-A2-Restricted Peptides and Montanide ISA51: Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT).2 of 160 of 723NCT00145158Trial comparisons
Cohort 1: 8 HLA-A2-restricted Peptides and CpG 7909 vs Cohort 2: 8 HLA-A2-Restricted Peptides and Montanide ISA51: deaths from any cause0 of 160 of 723NCT00145158Trial comparisons
Cohort 1: 8 HLA-A2-restricted Peptides and CpG 7909 vs Cohort 2: 8 HLA-A2-Restricted Peptides and Montanide ISA51: serious adverse events7 of 163 of 723NCT00145158Trial comparisons
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy: deaths from any cause0 of 140 of 822NCT02288897Trial comparisons
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy: Number of Participants With Adverse Events14 of 148 of 822NCT02288897Trial comparisons
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy: serious adverse events0 of 141 of 822NCT02288897Trial comparisons
Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort I: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg vs Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort II: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg: Phase 2 Expansion: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs
6 of 97 of 1221NCT04157517Trial comparisons
Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort I: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg vs Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort II: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg: Phase 2 Expansion: Number of Participants Reporting One or More TEAEs
8 of 912 of 1221NCT04157517Trial comparisons
Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort I: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg vs Phase 2, Expansion, Cohort II: Modakafusp Alfa 1.0 mg/kg + Pembrolizumab 400 mg: Phase 2 Expansion: Number of Participants Reporting One or More SAEs
2 of 96 of 1221NCT04157517Trial comparisons
Intralesional TALIMOGENE LAHERPAREPVEC Without Radiotherapy vs Intralesional TALIMOGENE LAHERPAREPVEC With Radiotherapy: deaths from any cause8 of 99 of 1019NCT02819843Trial comparisons
Intralesional TALIMOGENE LAHERPAREPVEC Without Radiotherapy vs Intralesional TALIMOGENE LAHERPAREPVEC With Radiotherapy: serious adverse events0 of 90 of 1019NCT02819843Trial comparisons
Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) vs Vaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1): deaths from any cause8 of 95 of 615NCT01876212Trial comparisons
Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) vs Vaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1): serious adverse events7 of 94 of 615NCT01876212Trial comparisons
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy: Complete Response Rate (CRR)3 of 92 of 615NCT02288897Trial comparisons
Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg vs Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg: serious adverse events1 of 60 of 612NCT01928940Trial comparisons
Nivolumab, NeoVax + Montanide, Ipilimumab (2.5 mg Per Injection Site) vs Nivolumab, NeoVax + Montanide, Ipilimumab (5.0 mg Per Injection Site): deaths from any cause1 of 61 of 511NCT03929029Trial comparisons
Nivolumab, NeoVax + Montanide, Ipilimumab (2.5 mg Per Injection Site) vs Nivolumab, NeoVax + Montanide, Ipilimumab (5.0 mg Per Injection Site): serious adverse events1 of 61 of 511NCT03929029Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005012/comparisons