ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03509350

Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Steroids in Sepsis

NCT03509350, Phase 3, Completed, Emory University; results first posted 2020-09-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Steroids in Sepsis. Trials, record NCT03509350. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03509350

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Steroids in Sepsis
NCT number
NCT03509350
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
501 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Conditions
Sepsis
Interventions
Vitamin C, Thiamine, Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C Placebo, Thiamine Placebo, Hydrocortisone Placebo
First posted
2018-04-26
Last updated
2021-04-13
Results first posted
2020-09-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryVasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)Up to Day 30
The primary outcome measure is VVFD in the first 30 days after the start of treatment. The endpoint was recorded to the nearest day. Participants who died are scored zero days, even if there was a period during which the participant was alive and free of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. Participants who must return to ventilation and/or vasopressors had their counters reset at zero days.
SecondaryMortality at 30 DaysDay 30The number of participants who did not survive until Day 30 is compared between study arms.
SecondaryIntensive Care Unit (ICU) MortalityDay 30The number of participants who died while in the ICU is compared between study arms.
SecondaryMortality at 180 DaysDay 180The number of participants who did not survive until Day 180 is compared between study arms.
SecondaryLength of ICU StayDay 30The number of days that participants were in the ICU is compared between study arms.
SecondaryLength of Hospital StayDay 30The number of days that participants were in the hospital is compared between study arms.
SecondaryDigit Span Test ScoreDay 180
The Digit Span Test is used to assesses attention. In the Digit Span Test, participants are read a series of numbers and are asked to repeat them back in the same order. The Digit Span test is scored by the number of digits the participant is able to remember in each test. Higher scores indicate greater ability to pay attention and to remember sequences. The average adult can remember about 7 numbers, plus or minus two, without making an error.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Delirium Assessed With the DeliriumTelephone Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)Day 180
The Telephone CAM evaluates dementia with 9-items, where additional questions are asked if symptoms are present. Rather than providing a summary score, if participants exhibit signs of a change in mental status which fluctuates and they experience inattention, along with disorganized thinking or altered level of consciousness, delirium is suggested.
SecondaryHayling Test ScoreDay 180
Executive function is assessed with the Hayling Test. The Hayling Test includes two parts of 15 items each where participants complete sentences by providing the missing word. The test is scored as the amount of time it takes, in seconds, to recite a correct response and the appropriateness of the response (in Part 2). Scaled scores range from 1 to 10 where 1 = impaired, 6 = average, and 10 = very superior.
SecondaryControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) ScoreDay 180
Language is assessed with the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Participants generate words beginning with selected letters within 60 seconds. Generating a higher number of words indicates greater language skills.

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYVasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)Up to Day 30This analysis uses an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, which includes all participants who enrolled in the study.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYMortality at 30 DaysDay 30ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYIntensive Care Unit (ICU) MortalityDay 30ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMortality at 180 DaysDay 180ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYLength of ICU StayDay 30daysMEAN
SECONDARYLength of Hospital StayDay 30daysMEAN
SECONDARYDigit Span Test ScoreDay 180numbers recalledMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Delirium Assessed With the DeliriumTelephone Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)Day 180Telephone data are available only on 168 participantsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYHayling Test ScoreDay 180units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) ScoreDay 180wordsMEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Vasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)Treatment Protocol25Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 29days
Vasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)Control Protocol26Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 28days
Mortality at 30 DaysTreatment Protocol56Participants
Mortality at 30 DaysControl Protocol60Participants
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) MortalityTreatment Protocol52Participants
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) MortalityControl Protocol49Participants
Mortality at 180 DaysTreatment Protocol102Participants
Mortality at 180 DaysControl Protocol94Participants
Length of ICU StayTreatment Protocol6.7Standard Deviation 7.3days
Length of ICU StayControl Protocol6.4Standard Deviation 6.9days

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment Protocol252
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Protocol249
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment Protocol252
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Protocol247
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Protocol0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Protocol2

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHemorrhagic shock due to hemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Protocol12521
otherHemorrhagic shock due to hemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Protocol02490
otherWorsening of renal functionRenal and urinary disordersTreatment Protocol12521
otherWorsening of renal functionRenal and urinary disordersControl Protocol02490

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Protocol102252
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Protocol94249
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Protocol2252
Total, other adverse eventsControl Protocol0249
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Protocol0252
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Protocol0249

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30953543DERIVEDPubMed
31801567DERIVEDPubMed
32007132DERIVEDPubMed
32317004DERIVEDPubMed
33620405DERIVEDPubMed
36853612DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons7

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: Number of Participants With Delirium Assessed With the DeliriumTelephone Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)Trial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) MortalityTrial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: Mortality at 30 DaysTrial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: Number of Participants EmployedTrial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: Mortality at 180 DaysTrial comparisons
Treatment Protocol vs Control Protocol: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests4

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Sentence Completion Inhibition TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Short Story RecallSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03509350

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03509350/results?page=2