ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04684238

Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old

NCT04684238, Phase 3, Completed, Sedana Medical; results first posted 2025-05-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old. Trials, record NCT04684238. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04684238

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old
NCT number
NCT04684238
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
94 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sedana Medical
Conditions
Sedation
Interventions
Midazolam, Isoflurane
First posted
2020-12-24
Last updated
2025-05-25
Results first posted
2025-05-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).
Percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate or deep sedation) prescribed at randomisation, monitored every 2 h for a minimum of 12 h (up to 48 h ± 6 h)
SecondaryCompare the Use of OpioidsFrom first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation) to end of the study treatment period
Dose of opioids from first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug) to end of study treatment period. This was a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Dose of opioids was expressed as fentanyl IV equivalents.
SecondaryCompare the Use of OpioidsLast 4 hours of study treatment compared to first 4 hours of study treatment after first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation).
Dose of opioids during the last 4 h of study treatment, as compared to the first 4 h of study treatment after first blinded COMFORT-B assessment. This was a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Dose of opioids is expressed as fentanyl IV equivalents.
SecondaryCompare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to ExtubationFrom end of study drug administration to extubation or end of extubation attemptTime from end of study drug administration to extubation if study drug was terminated for extubation
SecondaryCompare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous BreathingFrom initiation of study drug treatment to End of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)Proportion of observations with spontaneous breathing efforts during study treatment. This was a key secondary safety endpoint.
SecondaryEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor AgentFrom start of study treatment to end of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)
Need for additional inotropic/vasopressor agent defined by change in Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) during study treatment period compared to baseline. The VIS quantifies the amount of cardiovascular support required by infants postoperatively according to the below calculation: VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (U/kg/min). An increased VIS score correlates to an increase in inotropic/vasopressor agents.
SecondaryEvaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal SymptomFrom > 96 hours sedation (including pre-study sedation period) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.Evaluate the frequency of withdrawal symptoms in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients according to SOS-PD.
SecondaryEvaluate the Frequency of DeliriumPatients admitted to the ICU ≥48 hours (including period prior to study enrolment) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.Evaluate the frequency of delirium in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients
SecondaryEvaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor DysfunctionDuring study treatment and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam
Evaluate the frequency of neurological symptoms or psychomotor dysfunction during and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam treatment, and the association with duration of treatment, and total exposure (MAC hours and midazolam doses) over time.
SecondaryCompare the 30 Days/Hospital MortalityFrom start of study treatment up to 30 daysCompare the 30 days/hospital mortality in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).
Full Analysis set (FAS): The FAS included all randomised patients who received IMP and had at least a 6-hour sedation period and at least 3 blinded COMFORT-B-assessments. The FAS followed the intention-to-treat principle, i.e., patients were analysed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomisation. The main statistical analysis was performed on this population.
Percentage of timeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).
The PP analysis set included all patients in the FAS without any major protocol deviation affecting the primary analysis. To be included in the PP analysis patients had to have been sedated for at least 12h (which was interpreted as 12 h of study sedative treatment from start of IMP), with at least 50% of the planned COMFORT-B assessments performed.
Percentage of timeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCompare the Use of OpioidsFrom first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation) to end of the study treatment period
The FAS included all randomised patients who received IMP and had at least a 6-hour sedation period and at least 3 blinded COMFORT-B-assessments. The FAS followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, i.e., patients were analysed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomisation.
μg/kg/hLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCompare the Use of OpioidsLast 4 hours of study treatment compared to first 4 hours of study treatment after first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation).FAS: Patients with 8 hours or more of study treatment from first blinded COMFORT-B assessment.μg/kg/hLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCompare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to ExtubationFrom end of study drug administration to extubation or end of extubation attemptSubgroup of patients with endotracheal tube where wake-up was initiated at end of study treatmenthourMEAN
SECONDARYCompare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous BreathingFrom initiation of study drug treatment to End of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)Full Analysis Setproportion of timeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor AgentFrom start of study treatment to end of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)Safety analysis setChange from baseline in VISMEAN
SECONDARYEvaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal SymptomFrom > 96 hours sedation (including pre-study sedation period) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYEvaluate the Frequency of DeliriumPatients admitted to the ICU ≥48 hours (including period prior to study enrolment) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYEvaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor DysfunctionDuring study treatment and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolamParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Drug: Midazolam62.3795% Confidence Interval 44.70 to 80.04Percentage of time
Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Drug: Isoflurane68.9495% Confidence Interval 52.83 to 85.05Percentage of time
Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Drug: Midazolam65.5795% Confidence Interval 44.03 to 87.11Percentage of time
Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Drug: Isoflurane70.9195% Confidence Interval 50.75 to 91.07Percentage of time
Compare the Use of OpioidsDrug: Midazolam4.695% Confidence Interval 3.5 to 5.6μg/kg/h
Compare the Use of OpioidsDrug: Isoflurane2.195% Confidence Interval 1.3 to 2.9μg/kg/h
Compare the Use of OpioidsDrug: Midazolam0.5895% Confidence Interval -0.16 to 1.32μg/kg/h
Compare the Use of OpioidsDrug: Isoflurane-0.1995% Confidence Interval -0.74 to 0.35μg/kg/h
Compare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to ExtubationDrug: Midazolam1.09Inter-Quartile Range 0.49 to 5.50hour
Compare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to ExtubationDrug: Isoflurane0.75Inter-Quartile Range 0.25 to 1.5hour

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDrug: Midazolam33
Overall StudySTARTEDDrug: Isoflurane61
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDrug: Midazolam31
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDrug: Isoflurane60
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDrug: Midazolam2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDrug: Isoflurane1

Adverse events92

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHyperthermiaGeneral disordersDrug: Midazolam2332
otherHyperthermiaGeneral disordersDrug: Isoflurane1611
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDrug: Midazolam2332
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDrug: Isoflurane86113
otherHypoxiaGeneral disordersDrug: Midazolam1333
otherHypoxiaGeneral disordersDrug: Isoflurane46112
otherPleural effusionGeneral disordersDrug: Midazolam1332
otherPleural effusionGeneral disordersDrug: Isoflurane5616
otherDeliriumPsychiatric disordersDrug: Midazolam1331
otherDeliriumPsychiatric disordersDrug: Isoflurane5615

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDrug: Midazolam233
Total, all-cause mortalityDrug: Isoflurane161
Total, other adverse eventsDrug: Midazolam1333
Total, other adverse eventsDrug: Isoflurane3261
Total, serious adverse eventsDrug: Midazolam833
Total, serious adverse eventsDrug: Isoflurane1961

Papers16

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
10890677BACKGROUNDPubMed
15640636BACKGROUNDPubMed
16013698BACKGROUNDPubMed
16176317BACKGROUNDPubMed
16699772BACKGROUNDPubMed
18614330BACKGROUNDPubMed
20122588BACKGROUNDPubMed
22079951BACKGROUNDPubMed
22380747BACKGROUNDPubMed
23643411BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 16

See all 16 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: Compare the 30 Days/Hospital MortalityTrial comparisons
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: Evaluate the Frequency of DeliriumTrial comparisons
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: Evaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor DysfunctionTrial comparisons
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: Evaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal SymptomTrial comparisons
Drug: Midazolam vs Drug: Isoflurane: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684238

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684238/results?page=2