ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last4,801 to 4,820 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Liquid Rotarix Group vs Lyophilized Rotarix Group: serious adverse events37 of 636

38 of 638

-0.1 points

-2.8 to 2.5

1,274NCT00363545

To Assess Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity & Safety of 2 Formulations of GSK's HRV Vaccine as 2-dose Vaccination (Infants)

38 Weeks Group vs 39 Weeks Group: serious adverse events1 of 636

2 of 638

-0.2 points

-1.0 to 0.6

1,274NCT00835003

Timing of Planned Caesarean Section and Morbidity of the Newborn

PA Group vs AL Group: serious adverse events3 of 849

2 of 423

-0.1 points

-1.4 to 0.6

1,272NCT00422084

Pyronaridine Artesunate (3:1) Versus Coartem® in P Falciparum Malaria Patients

38 Weeks Group vs 39 Weeks Group: Neonatal Admission After Elective Caesarean Section88 of 635

76 of 637

1.9 points

-1.8 to 5.6

1,272NCT00835003

Timing of Planned Caesarean Section and Morbidity of the Newborn

HRV Porcine Circovirus (PCV)-Free Liquid Group vs HRV Lyophilized Group: Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).20 of 632

19 of 640

0.2 points

-1.8 to 2.2

1,272NCT03207750

This Study Will Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of the Routine Infant Vaccines Pediarix®, Hiberix® and Prevenar 13® When Co-administered With GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Liquid Human Rotavirus Vaccine (HRV) as Compared to GSK's Licensed Lyophilized Vaccine

HRV Porcine Circovirus (PCV)-Free Liquid Group vs HRV Lyophilized Group: deaths from any cause1 of 632

0 of 640

0.2 points

-0.5 to 0.9

1,272NCT03207750

This Study Will Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of the Routine Infant Vaccines Pediarix®, Hiberix® and Prevenar 13® When Co-administered With GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Liquid Human Rotavirus Vaccine (HRV) as Compared to GSK's Licensed Lyophilized Vaccine

HRV Porcine Circovirus (PCV)-Free Liquid Group vs HRV Lyophilized Group: Number of Subjects With Any Unsolicited AEs.294 of 632

327 of 640

-4.6 points

-10.0 to 0.9

1,272NCT03207750

This Study Will Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of the Routine Infant Vaccines Pediarix®, Hiberix® and Prevenar 13® When Co-administered With GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Liquid Human Rotavirus Vaccine (HRV) as Compared to GSK's Licensed Lyophilized Vaccine

HRV Porcine Circovirus (PCV)-Free Liquid Group vs HRV Lyophilized Group: serious adverse events20 of 632

19 of 640

0.2 points

-1.8 to 2.2

1,272NCT03207750

This Study Will Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of the Routine Infant Vaccines Pediarix®, Hiberix® and Prevenar 13® When Co-administered With GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Liquid Human Rotavirus Vaccine (HRV) as Compared to GSK's Licensed Lyophilized Vaccine

Pyronaridine - Artesunate vs Mefloquine Plus Artesunate: serious adverse events6 of 848

3 of 423

-0.0 points

-1.4 to 0.9

1,271NCT00403260

Pyronaridine - Artesunate (3:1) Versus Mefloquine Plus Artesunate in Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria Patients

Testosterone vs Placebo: serious adverse events33 of 1,019

10 of 251

-0.7 points

-4.1 to 1.5

1,270NCT00467259

Endometrial Safety Study of Transdermal Testosterone (300 Mcg/Day) in Naturally Postmenopausal Women

IVR Intervention Group vs IVR Control Group: serious adverse events138 of 604

149 of 666

0.5 points

-4.1 to 5.1

1,270NCT02056431

Balancing Treatment Outcomes and Medication Burden Among Patients With Symptomatic Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Best Practice Clinic-Based Care vs Telehealth Care: Number of Participants Reporting High Confidence in Reporting Contacting Care Team at Six Months Confidence in Managing Blood Pressure: Contact Care Team481 of 671

467 of 598

-6.4 points

-11.1 to -1.6

1,269NCT02996565

Pragmatic Trial Comparing Telehealth Care and Optimized Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure

Best Practice Clinic-Based Care vs Telehealth Care: Number of Participants Reporting High Confidence in Keeping BP Below Target at Six Months242 of 670

252 of 599

-6.0 points

-11.3 to -0.6

1,269NCT02996565

Pragmatic Trial Comparing Telehealth Care and Optimized Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure

Chemotherapy Cohort vs Hormonal Therapy Cohort: serious adverse events76 of 832

22 of 435

4.1 points

1.0 to 6.8

1,267NCT00726661

An Observational Study of Treatment Patterns and Safety Outcomes for Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer (VIRGO)

Afluria® Group vs Fluzone® Group: serious adverse events22 of 630

26 of 636

-0.6 points

-2.8 to 1.6

1,266NCT00735475

A Study to Determine the Immunogenicity and Safety Profile of CSL Limited's Influenza Virus Vaccine Compared to a US Licensed Comparator Influenza Virus Vaccine

Cervarix Group Without HPV-18 12-Month Persistent Infection vs Cervarix Group With HPV-18 12-Month Persistent Infection: Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Anti-HPV-18 Without and With 12-month Persistent Infection1,237 of 1,243

21 of 21

-0.5 points

-1.0 to 15.0

1,264NCT00122681

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine Efficacy Trial Against Cervical Pre-cancer in Young Adults With GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals HPV-16/18

Molnupiravir vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants Who Had Undetectable SARS-CoV-2 in Baseline NP Swabs and Developed COVID-19 (Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Symptoms) Through Day 2951 of 630

65 of 634

-2.2 points

-5.4 to 1.0

1,264NCT04939428

Study of MK-4482 for Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Adults (MK-4482-013)

TAXUS Element vs TAXUS Express: serious adverse events334 of 942

110 of 320

1.1 points

-5.1 to 7.0

1,262NCT00484315

TAXUS PERSEUS Workhorse

Regional Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia: Postoperative Delirium130 of 633

124 of 629

0.8 points

-3.6 to 5.2

1,262NCT02507505

Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence After Hip Fracture

Best Practice Clinic-Based Care vs Telehealth Care: Number of Participants Reporting High Confidence in Taking BP Medications at Six Months564 of 667

532 of 595

-4.9 points

-8.5 to -1.1

1,262NCT02996565

Pragmatic Trial Comparing Telehealth Care and Optimized Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=241"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=241

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT00363545-sae",
        "title": "Liquid Rotarix Group vs Lyophilized Rotarix Group: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "37 of 636 against 38 of 638; risk difference -0.1 points, 95% interval -2.8 to 2.5; NCT00363545, To Assess Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity & Safety of 2 Formulations of GSK's HRV Vaccine as 2-dose Vaccination (Infants)",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00363545-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT00363545",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 1274,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.001385027897714948,
          "lower": -0.02769950838529791,
          "upper": 0.024918780938716377
        },
        "group_1": "37 of 636",
        "group_2": "38 of 638",
        "difference": "-0.1 points",
        "interval": "-2.8 to 2.5",
        "trial_title": "To Assess Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity & Safety of 2 Formulations of GSK's HRV Vaccine as 2-dose Vaccination (Infants)"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00835003-sae",
        "title": "38 Weeks Group vs 39 Weeks Group: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "1 of 636 against 2 of 638; risk difference -0.2 points, 95% interval -1.0 to 0.6; NCT00835003, Timing of Planned Caesarean Section and Morbidity of the Newborn",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00835003-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT00835003",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 1274,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.0015624691942193567,
          "lower": -0.009886017334049422,
          "upper": 0.006064254992967399
        },
        "group_1": "1 of 636",
        "group_2": "2 of 638",
        "difference": "-0.2 points",
        "interval": "-1.0 to 0.6",
        "trial_title": "Timing of Planned Caesarean Section and Morbidity of the Newborn"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=242",
  "request_id": "izWDh22KRAOGiFVT"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

Instruments

The conductscience.com catalog

One instrument from the ConductScience store with the tests, measures and species it is used for, the papers that used it, and the MeSH topics of those papers.

Drugs and targets

Open Targets

One drug with its targets, the diseases it is studied for, and the trials that name it, with their comparisons, papers and cognitive tests.

Diseases

Open Targets

One disease with the drugs studied for it, the targets those drugs act on, and the trials that study it, with their comparisons and papers.

Companies

ClinicalTrials.gov

One company with the trials it leads or helps run, the drugs those trials test, the conditions they study and the organizations it runs them with.

Cell lines

Cellosaurus

One cell line with the problems Cellosaurus records for it, its relatives, the cell banks that hold it, and the papers that used it.

Journal index

PubMed and NLM's journal list

One journal with its papers in PubMed since 1959, year by year, its retracted papers, errata and expressions of concern, and how many of its papers have a copy in PMC.

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?