ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0004995

Comparisons in its trials71

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Aims 1, 2B, and 3 Groups vs Aim 2A Group: deaths from any cause22,208 of 386,2760 of 25386,301NCT05214573Trial comparisons
Aims 1, 2B, and 3 Groups vs Aim 2A Group: serious adverse events40,642 of 386,2760 of 25386,301NCT05214573Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions88 of 2,22096 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions50 of 2,22063 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions88 of 2,22096 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions68 of 2,22060 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
186 of 2,220191 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
181 of 2,220188 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events321 of 2,220323 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions72 of 2,22062 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause139 of 2,220160 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up vs Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up: Number of Participants With an Event of Death Due to a Bone Fracture-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
0 of 2,2200 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions53 of 2,22064 of 2,2274,447NCT00379769Trial comparisons
Cycloset vs Placebo: Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events176 of 2,05498 of 1,0163,070NCT00377676Trial comparisons
Cycloset vs Placebo: serious adverse events176 of 2,05498 of 1,0163,070NCT00377676Trial comparisons
Evolocumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events212 of 983204 of 9901,973NCT02207634Trial comparisons
Dapagliflozin vs Placebo: serious adverse events41 of 48246 of 483965NCT01042977Trial comparisons
Experimental vs Placebo Comparator: serious adverse events27 of 46026 of 462922NCT01031680Trial comparisons
Varenicline (Var) vs Placebo (Pbo): Number of Responders With Continuous Abstinence (CA) Through Week 24100 of 35334 of 350703NCT00282984Trial comparisons
Varenicline (Var) vs Placebo (Pbo): Number of Participants With a 4 Week Point Prevalence of Smoking Cessation99 of 35357 of 350703NCT00282984Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0004995/comparisons