ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last1,961 to 1,980 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects With SUs5 of 2,238

11 of 2,246

-0.3 points

-0.7 to 0.1

4,484NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects With CSULGIES or Symptomatic Ulcers (SUs)25 of 2,238

92 of 2,246

-3.0 points

-3.9 to -2.1

4,484NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects Withdrawn Due to GI Adverse Events (AEs)114 of 2,238

167 of 2,246

-2.3 points

-3.8 to -0.9

4,484NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying (TIRS) vs Routine Aedes-borne Virus (ABV) Prevention and Control: deaths from any cause1 of 2,239

2 of 2,222

-0.0 points

-0.3 to 0.2

4,461NCT04343521

Quantifying the Epidemiological Impact of Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying on Aedes-borne Diseases

Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying (TIRS) vs Routine Aedes-borne Virus (ABV) Prevention and Control: serious adverse events0 of 2,239

2 of 2,222

-0.1 points

-0.3 to 0.1

4,461NCT04343521

Quantifying the Epidemiological Impact of Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying on Aedes-borne Diseases

Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: serious adverse events61 of 2,223

61 of 2,237

0.0 points

-1.0 to 1.0

4,460NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Denosumab vs Placebo: deaths from any cause215 of 2,241

215 of 2,218

-0.1 points

-1.8 to 1.6

4,459NCT01077154

Study of Denosumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Women With High Risk Early Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Therapy (D-CARE)

Denosumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events702 of 2,241

675 of 2,218

0.9 points

-1.8 to 3.6

4,459NCT01077154

Study of Denosumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Women With High Risk Early Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Therapy (D-CARE)

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions88 of 2,220

96 of 2,227

-0.3 points

-1.5 to 0.8

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions50 of 2,220

63 of 2,227

-0.6 points

-1.5 to 0.4

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions88 of 2,220

96 of 2,227

-0.3 points

-1.5 to 0.8

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions68 of 2,220

60 of 2,227

0.4 points

-0.6 to 1.4

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions186 of 2,220

191 of 2,227

-0.2 points

-1.8 to 1.4

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions181 of 2,220

188 of 2,227

-0.3 points

-1.9 to 1.3

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events321 of 2,220

323 of 2,227

-0.0 points

-2.1 to 2.0

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions72 of 2,220

62 of 2,227

0.5 points

-0.6 to 1.5

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause139 of 2,220

160 of 2,227

-0.9 points

-2.4 to 0.6

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions53 of 2,220

64 of 2,227

-0.5 points

-1.4 to 0.5

4,447NCT00379769

RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes

Universal PrEP Counselling vs Targeted PrEP Clinics: Appropriate PrEP Decision1,535 of 2,250

1,299 of 2,197

9.1 points

6.3 to 11.9

4,447NCT03070600

PrEP Implementation for Mothers in Antenatal Care

Universal PrEP Counselling vs Targeted PrEP Clinics: PrEP Acceptance441 of 2,250

387 of 2,197

2.0 points

-0.3 to 4.3

4,447NCT03070600

PrEP Implementation for Mothers in Antenatal Care

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=99"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=99

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT00141102-3926df21",
        "title": "Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects With SUs",
        "summary": "5 of 2238 against 11 of 2246; risk difference -0.3 points, 95% interval -0.7 to 0.1; NCT00141102, Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00141102-3926df21",
        "nct_id": "NCT00141102",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 4484,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.00266345810285707,
          "lower": -0.006721778351325638,
          "upper": 0.001021741198921569
        },
        "group_1": "5 of 2,238",
        "group_2": "11 of 2,246",
        "difference": "-0.3 points",
        "interval": "-0.7 to 0.1",
        "trial_title": "Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00141102-46da923d",
        "title": "Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects With CSULGIES or Symptomatic Ulcers (SUs)",
        "summary": "25 of 2238 against 92 of 2246; risk difference -3.0 points, 95% interval -3.9 to -2.1; NCT00141102, Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00141102-46da923d",
        "nct_id": "NCT00141102",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 4484,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.02979102159175641,
          "lower": -0.039491980975307844,
          "upper": -0.020671851264973524
        },
        "group_1": "25 of 2,238",
        "group_2": "92 of 2,246",
        "difference": "-3.0 points",
        "interval": "-3.9 to -2.1",
        "trial_title": "Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=100",
  "request_id": "uYuXNJbS15SpLcVN"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?