ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005298

Comparisons in its trials113

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Patients Treated With ABL vs Patients Treated With TPTD: Number of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Nonfatal MI, Nonfatal Stroke, Heart Failure or In-hospital Cardiovascular Death495 of 11,027471 of 11,02722,054NCT04974723Trial comparisons
Patients Treated With ABL vs Patients Treated With TPTD: Number of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture313 of 11,027333 of 11,02722,054NCT04974723Trial comparisons
Patients Treated With ABL vs Patients Treated With TPTD: Number of Participants With Hip Fracture112 of 11,027125 of 11,02722,054NCT04974723Trial comparisons
Patients Treated With ABL vs Patients Treated With TPTD: deaths from any cause10 of 11,0279 of 11,02722,054NCT04974723Trial comparisons
Patients Treated With ABL vs Patients Treated With TPTD: Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), Nonfatal Stroke, or In-hospital Cardiovascular Death221 of 11,027211 of 11,02722,054NCT04974723Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Nonvertebral Fractures238 of 3,902293 of 3,9067,808NCT00089791Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With a Hip Fracture26 of 3,90243 of 3,9067,808NCT00089791Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: serious adverse events1,004 of 3,886972 of 3,8767,762NCT00089791Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures86 of 3,702264 of 3,6917,393NCT00089791Trial comparisons
Placebo (Core+SE I+SE II) vs Bazedoxifene 20 mg (SE II): Number of Participants With Worsening Vertebral Fractures Through Month 841 of 1,7417 of 3,4105,151NCT00205777Trial comparisons
SMC021 vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Non-vertebral Fractures75 of 2,33482 of 2,3314,665NCT00525798Trial comparisons
SMC021 vs Placebo: serious adverse events340 of 2,334378 of 2,3314,665NCT00525798Trial comparisons
Denosumab / Denosumab vs Placebo / Denosumab: Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures172 of 2,343219 of 2,2074,550NCT00523341Trial comparisons
Denosumab / Denosumab vs Placebo / Denosumab: Number of Participants With Antibodies to Denosumab0 of 2,3431 of 2,2064,549NCT00523341Trial comparisons
Denosumab/ Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo/ Denosumab 60 mg Q6M: serious adverse events1,014 of 2,343945 of 2,2064,549NCT00523341Trial comparisons
SMC021 vs Placebo: Number of Patients With New Vertebral Fractures94 of 2,06499 of 2,1254,189NCT00525798Trial comparisons
Denosumab / Denosumab vs Placebo / Denosumab: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures149 of 2,116145 of 1,9914,107NCT00523341Trial comparisons
5 mg Risedronate vs 150 mg Risedronate: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population8 of 6428 of 6501,292NCT00247273Trial comparisons
5 mg Risedronate vs 150 mg Risedronate: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture at Month 24, ITT Population14 of 64214 of 6501,292NCT00247273Trial comparisons
5 mg Risedronate vs 150 mg Risedronate: serious adverse events51 of 64277 of 6501,292NCT00247273Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005298/comparisons