Genes
NCBI Gene
One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.
85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last4,661 to 4,680 of 85,013
| Comparison | With the outcome | Risk difference, 95% interval | Participants | Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: serious adverse events | 548 of 884 293 of 450 | -3.1 points -8.5 to 2.4 | 1,334 | NCT02389946 Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions |
| Tyvaso vs Control: serious adverse events | 96 of 666 94 of 667 | 0.3 points -3.4 to 4.1 | 1,333 | NCT01266265 Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies |
| mPATH-Lung vs Usual Care (CONTROL): Number of Participants With Electronic Health Record-verified Completion of a Chest CT Scan | 164 of 669 113 of 664 | 7.5 points 3.1 to 11.8 | 1,333 | NCT04083859 Digital Outreach Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening |
| Test Culture vs Control Culture: serious adverse events | 13 of 654 8 of 678 | 0.8 points -0.6 to 2.3 | 1,332 | NCT00565747 Efficacy Study of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) for Use in Human IVF |
| Boostrix Group vs Decavac Group: serious adverse events | 37 of 887 10 of 445 | 1.9 points -0.2 to 3.8 | 1,332 | NCT00835237 Evaluation of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' Boostrix® Vaccine in Comparison With Decavac™ Vaccine. |
| Antibiotics Therapy Arm vs Appendectomy Arm: Number of Participants With at Least One Complications From Treatment | 37 of 676 21 of 656 | 2.3 points 0.1 to 4.5 | 1,332 | NCT02800785 The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) Trial |
| Antibiotics Therapy Arm vs Appendectomy Arm: serious adverse events | 19 of 676 19 of 656 | -0.1 points -2.0 to 1.8 | 1,332 | NCT02800785 The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) Trial |
| Restrictive vs Liberal: A Composite Endpoint of Postoperative Infectious Complications at 90 Days Post-randomization: Infectious Complications Will Include Wound Infections, Pneumonia, and Sepsis | 100 of 679 103 of 652 | -1.1 points -5.0 to 2.8 | 1,331 | NCT03229941 Transfusion Trigger After Operations in High Cardiac Risk Patients |
| Flublok Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4): serious adverse events | 10 of 998 2 of 332 | 0.4 points -1.2 to 1.3 | 1,330 | NCT02290509 Safety and Immunogenicity of Flublok Quadrivalent vs IIV4 in Adults 18-49 Years of Age |
| 0-7d Preservation Time Group vs 8-14d Preservation Time Group: deaths from any cause | 20 of 675 32 of 654 | -1.9 points -4.1 to 0.2 | 1,329 | NCT01537393 Cornea Preservation Time Study |
| 0-7d Preservation Time Group vs 8-14d Preservation Time Group: serious adverse events | 1 of 675 2 of 654 | -0.2 points -1.0 to 0.6 | 1,329 | NCT01537393 Cornea Preservation Time Study |
| Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: deaths from any cause | 1 of 661 2 of 667 | -0.1 points -0.9 to 0.6 | 1,328 | NCT04743908 Community Network-driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central US |
| Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: serious adverse events | 1 of 661 0 of 667 | 0.2 points -0.4 to 0.9 | 1,328 | NCT04743908 Community Network-driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central US |
| Adacel Vaccine vs Td Adsorbed Vaccine: serious adverse events | 8 of 999 1 of 328 | 0.5 points -1.0 to 1.3 | 1,327 | NCT01439165 Safety and Immunogenicity in Adults of Revaccination With Adacel® Vaccine 10 Years After a Previous Dose |
| SB204 4% vs Vehicle Gel: serious adverse events | 1 of 666 3 of 661 | -0.3 points -1.2 to 0.5 | 1,327 | NCT02667444 P3 Study Comparing Once Daily SB204 and Vehicle Gel in Acne |
| Population A vs Population B: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL Scale. | 518 of 658 468 of 669 | 8.8 points 4.1 to 13.4 | 1,327 | NCT05070897 Health Literacy and Digital Health in Cancer Patients. |
| FE 999049 vs GONAL-F: serious adverse events | 16 of 665 10 of 661 | 0.9 points -0.7 to 2.5 | 1,326 | NCT01956110 Evidence-based Stimulation Trial With Human rFSH in Europe and Rest of World 1 |
| Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: Number of Participants With Procedure Success | 827 of 881 401 of 445 | 3.8 points 0.7 to 7.2 | 1,326 | NCT02389946 Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions |
| Treatment Group vs Control Group: First Survived Resuscitation of Sudden Cardiac Arrest (Evaluation Will Also be Made by the ERC) | 18 of 666 16 of 659 | 0.3 points -1.5 to 2.1 | 1,325 | NCT00733343 Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure |
| Treatment Group vs Control Group: Unplanned Hospitalisation/Prolongation of Hospitalisation for Other Reasons or Death | 452 of 666 448 of 659 | -0.1 points -5.1 to 4.9 | 1,325 | NCT00733343 Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure |
Code
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=234"
Response
The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=234
{
"data": {
"total": 85013,
"results": [
{
"id": "NCT02389946-sae",
"title": "Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: serious adverse events",
"summary": "548 of 884 against 293 of 450; risk difference -3.1 points, 95% interval -8.5 to 2.4; NCT02389946, Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions",
"record": "/library/comparisons/NCT02389946-sae",
"nct_id": "NCT02389946",
"kind": "serious-adverse-events",
"participants": 1334,
"risk_difference": {
"value": -0.031201608848667628,
"lower": -0.08474598261239495,
"upper": 0.023799932212360327
},
"group_1": "548 of 884",
"group_2": "293 of 450",
"difference": "-3.1 points",
"interval": "-8.5 to 2.4",
"trial_title": "Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions"
},
{
"id": "NCT01266265-sae",
"title": "Tyvaso vs Control: serious adverse events",
"summary": "96 of 666 against 94 of 667; risk difference 0.3 points, 95% interval -3.4 to 4.1; NCT01266265, Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies",
"record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01266265-sae",
"nct_id": "NCT01266265",
"kind": "serious-adverse-events",
"participants": 1333,
"risk_difference": {
"value": 0.0032146089117603416,
"lower": -0.03443215269918266,
"upper": 0.040868712702665774
},
"group_1": "96 of 666",
"group_2": "94 of 667",
"difference": "0.3 points",
"interval": "-3.4 to 4.1",
"trial_title": "Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies"
}
],
"no_events": 33758,
"columns": [
{
"key": "title",
"label": "Comparison"
},
{
"key": "group_1",
"label": "With the outcome",
"under": "group_2"
},
{
"key": "difference",
"label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
"under": "interval"
},
{
"key": "participants",
"label": "Participants"
},
{
"key": "nct_id",
"label": "Trial",
"under": "trial_title"
}
],
"order": "Most participants first",
"kinds": {
"all": 85013,
"outcome": 33568,
"serious-adverse-events": 31897,
"deaths": 19548
}
},
"release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
"terms": [
{
"source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
"license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
"notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
"short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
},
{
"source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
"license": "none stated",
"notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
"short": "No license stated"
}
],
"next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=235",
"request_id": "O2AClv_uwpqI3rg_"
}Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
NCBI Gene
One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.
Patent publications
Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.
Opens sequences.conductscience.org
The conductscience.com catalog
One instrument from the ConductScience store with the tests, measures and species it is used for, the papers that used it, and the MeSH topics of those papers.
Open Targets
One drug with its targets, the diseases it is studied for, and the trials that name it, with their comparisons, papers and cognitive tests.
Open Targets
One disease with the drugs studied for it, the targets those drugs act on, and the trials that study it, with their comparisons and papers.
ClinicalTrials.gov
One company with the trials it leads or helps run, the drugs those trials test, the conditions they study and the organizations it runs them with.
Cellosaurus
One cell line with the problems Cellosaurus records for it, its relatives, the cell banks that hold it, and the papers that used it.
PubMed and NLM's journal list
One journal with its papers in PubMed since 1959, year by year, its retracted papers, errata and expressions of concern, and how many of its papers have a copy in PMC.
For software
Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome
Ask an assistant