ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last4,661 to 4,680 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: serious adverse events548 of 884

293 of 450

-3.1 points

-8.5 to 2.4

1,334NCT02389946

Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions

Tyvaso vs Control: serious adverse events96 of 666

94 of 667

0.3 points

-3.4 to 4.1

1,333NCT01266265

Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies

mPATH-Lung vs Usual Care (CONTROL): Number of Participants With Electronic Health Record-verified Completion of a Chest CT Scan164 of 669

113 of 664

7.5 points

3.1 to 11.8

1,333NCT04083859

Digital Outreach Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening

Test Culture vs Control Culture: serious adverse events13 of 654

8 of 678

0.8 points

-0.6 to 2.3

1,332NCT00565747

Efficacy Study of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) for Use in Human IVF

Boostrix Group vs Decavac Group: serious adverse events37 of 887

10 of 445

1.9 points

-0.2 to 3.8

1,332NCT00835237

Evaluation of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' Boostrix® Vaccine in Comparison With Decavac™ Vaccine.

Antibiotics Therapy Arm vs Appendectomy Arm: Number of Participants With at Least One Complications From Treatment37 of 676

21 of 656

2.3 points

0.1 to 4.5

1,332NCT02800785

The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) Trial

Antibiotics Therapy Arm vs Appendectomy Arm: serious adverse events19 of 676

19 of 656

-0.1 points

-2.0 to 1.8

1,332NCT02800785

The Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) Trial

Restrictive vs Liberal: A Composite Endpoint of Postoperative Infectious Complications at 90 Days Post-randomization: Infectious Complications Will Include Wound Infections, Pneumonia, and Sepsis100 of 679

103 of 652

-1.1 points

-5.0 to 2.8

1,331NCT03229941

Transfusion Trigger After Operations in High Cardiac Risk Patients

Flublok Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4): serious adverse events10 of 998

2 of 332

0.4 points

-1.2 to 1.3

1,330NCT02290509

Safety and Immunogenicity of Flublok Quadrivalent vs IIV4 in Adults 18-49 Years of Age

0-7d Preservation Time Group vs 8-14d Preservation Time Group: deaths from any cause20 of 675

32 of 654

-1.9 points

-4.1 to 0.2

1,329NCT01537393

Cornea Preservation Time Study

0-7d Preservation Time Group vs 8-14d Preservation Time Group: serious adverse events1 of 675

2 of 654

-0.2 points

-1.0 to 0.6

1,329NCT01537393

Cornea Preservation Time Study

Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: deaths from any cause1 of 661

2 of 667

-0.1 points

-0.9 to 0.6

1,328NCT04743908

Community Network-driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central US

Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: serious adverse events1 of 661

0 of 667

0.2 points

-0.4 to 0.9

1,328NCT04743908

Community Network-driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central US

Adacel Vaccine vs Td Adsorbed Vaccine: serious adverse events8 of 999

1 of 328

0.5 points

-1.0 to 1.3

1,327NCT01439165

Safety and Immunogenicity in Adults of Revaccination With Adacel® Vaccine 10 Years After a Previous Dose

SB204 4% vs Vehicle Gel: serious adverse events1 of 666

3 of 661

-0.3 points

-1.2 to 0.5

1,327NCT02667444

P3 Study Comparing Once Daily SB204 and Vehicle Gel in Acne

Population A vs Population B: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL Scale.518 of 658

468 of 669

8.8 points

4.1 to 13.4

1,327NCT05070897

Health Literacy and Digital Health in Cancer Patients.

FE 999049 vs GONAL-F: serious adverse events16 of 665

10 of 661

0.9 points

-0.7 to 2.5

1,326NCT01956110

Evidence-based Stimulation Trial With Human rFSH in Europe and Rest of World 1

Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: Number of Participants With Procedure Success827 of 881

401 of 445

3.8 points

0.7 to 7.2

1,326NCT02389946

Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions

Treatment Group vs Control Group: First Survived Resuscitation of Sudden Cardiac Arrest (Evaluation Will Also be Made by the ERC)18 of 666

16 of 659

0.3 points

-1.5 to 2.1

1,325NCT00733343

Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure

Treatment Group vs Control Group: Unplanned Hospitalisation/Prolongation of Hospitalisation for Other Reasons or Death452 of 666

448 of 659

-0.1 points

-5.1 to 4.9

1,325NCT00733343

Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=234"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=234

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT02389946-sae",
        "title": "Orsiro Sirolimus Coronary Stent System vs Xience Everolimus Coronary Stent System: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "548 of 884 against 293 of 450; risk difference -3.1 points, 95% interval -8.5 to 2.4; NCT02389946, Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT02389946-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT02389946",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 1334,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.031201608848667628,
          "lower": -0.08474598261239495,
          "upper": 0.023799932212360327
        },
        "group_1": "548 of 884",
        "group_2": "293 of 450",
        "difference": "-3.1 points",
        "interval": "-8.5 to 2.4",
        "trial_title": "Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT01266265-sae",
        "title": "Tyvaso vs Control: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "96 of 666 against 94 of 667; risk difference 0.3 points, 95% interval -3.4 to 4.1; NCT01266265, Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01266265-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT01266265",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 1333,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.0032146089117603416,
          "lower": -0.03443215269918266,
          "upper": 0.040868712702665774
        },
        "group_1": "96 of 666",
        "group_2": "94 of 667",
        "difference": "0.3 points",
        "interval": "-3.4 to 4.1",
        "trial_title": "Study of Incidence of Respiratory Tract AEs in Patients Treated With Tyvaso® Compared to Other FDA Approved PAH Therapies"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=235",
  "request_id": "O2AClv_uwpqI3rg_"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

Instruments

The conductscience.com catalog

One instrument from the ConductScience store with the tests, measures and species it is used for, the papers that used it, and the MeSH topics of those papers.

Drugs and targets

Open Targets

One drug with its targets, the diseases it is studied for, and the trials that name it, with their comparisons, papers and cognitive tests.

Diseases

Open Targets

One disease with the drugs studied for it, the targets those drugs act on, and the trials that study it, with their comparisons and papers.

Companies

ClinicalTrials.gov

One company with the trials it leads or helps run, the drugs those trials test, the conditions they study and the organizations it runs them with.

Cell lines

Cellosaurus

One cell line with the problems Cellosaurus records for it, its relatives, the cell banks that hold it, and the papers that used it.

Journal index

PubMed and NLM's journal list

One journal with its papers in PubMed since 1959, year by year, its retracted papers, errata and expressions of concern, and how many of its papers have a copy in PMC.

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?